Bibliografia sulla Critica della Psicoanalisi

Arlow, J., & Brenner, C. (1964). Psychoanalytic concepts and the structural theory. New York:
International Universities Press.
Arlow, J., & Brenner, C. (1988). The future of psychoanalysis. Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 57, 1–14.
Assoun, P. (1995). Freud, la philosophie, et les philosophes. Paris: Presses Universitaires de
France.
Bachrach, H., Galatzer, L. R., Skolnikoff, A., & Waldron, S. J. (1991). On the efficacy of psychoanalysis.
Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 39, 871–916.
Basch, M. (1994). Psychoanalysis, science and epistemology. Bulletin of the [Chicago] Institute
for Psychoanalysis, 4(2), 1, 8–9.
Borch-Jacobsen, M. (1996). Remembering Anna O: 100 years of psychoanalytic mystification. New
York: Routledge.
Brenner, C. (1982). The mind in conf lict. New York: International Universities Press.
Brentano, B. (1995). Psychology from an empirical standpoint. New York: Routledge & Kegan
Paul.
Breuer, J., & Freud, S. (1893). On the psychical mechanism of hysterical phenomena: Preliminary
communication. In J. Strachey (Ed. & Trans.), The standard edition of the complete psychological
works of Sigmund Freud (Vol. 2, pp. 1–17). London: Hogarth Press.
Brà¶der, A. (1995). Unbewusstes semantisches priming laborinduzierter sprechfehler (Unconscious
semantic priming of laboratory-induced slips of the tongue). Bonn, Germany: University of
Bonn. “Diplomarbeit” in psychology.
Brà¶der, A., & Bredenkamp, J. (1996). SLIP-Technik, prozessdissoziationsmodell und multinomiale
modellierrung: Neue werkzeuge zum experimentellen nachweis “Freudscher versprecher”
(Slip-technique, process-dissociation-model and multinomial modeling: New methods for the
experimental confirmation of Freudian slips of the tongue)Zeitschrift fà¼r Experimentelle Psychologie,
43, 175–202.
Cleckley, H. (1988). The mask of sanity (5th ed.). Augusta, GA: Emily S. Cleckley.
Eagle, M. (1987). The psychoanalytic and the cognitive unconscious. In R. Stern (Ed.), Theories
of the unconscious and theories of the self (pp. 155–189). Hillsdale, NJ: Analytic Press.
Eagle, M. (1993). The dynamics of theory change in psychoanalysis. In J. Earman, A. I. Janis,
G. J. Massey, & N. Rescher (Eds.), Philosophical problems of the internal and external
worlds: Essays on the philosophy of Adolf Grà¼nbaum (pp. 373–408). Pittsburgh, PA: University
of Pittsburgh Press.
Edelson, M. (1984). Hypothesis and evidence in psychoanalysis. Chicago: University of Chicago
Press.

Glymour, C. (1983). The theory of your dreams. In R. S. Cohen & L. Laudan (Eds.), Physics, philosophy,
and psychoanalysis: Essays in honor of Adolf Grà¼nbaum (pp. 57–71). Boston: Reidel.
Goleman, D. (1994, May 31). Miscoding is seen as the root of false memories. New York Times,
Sec. C, pp. C1, C8.
Green, A. (1995). Against Lacanism. Journal of European Psychoanalysis, 169–185.
Grà¼nbaum, A. (1973). Philosophical problems of space and time (2nd ed., Boston Studies in the
Philosophy of Science, Vol. 12). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Reidel.
Grà¼nbaum, A. (1984). The foundations of psychoanalysis: A philosophical critique. Berkeley: University
of California Press.
Grà¼nbaum, A. (1986, June). Author’s response to 40 reviewers: Is Freud’s theory well-founded?
Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 9(2), 266–284.
Grà¼nbaum, A. (1990, September). “Meaning” connections and causal connections in the human
sciences: The poverty of hermeneutic philosophy. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association,
38(3), 559–577.
Grà¼nbaum, A. (1993). Validation in the clinical theory of psychoanalysis: A study in the philosophy
of psychoanalysis. Madison, CT: International Universities Press.
Grà¼nbaum, A. (1994, August 11). Freud’s permanent revolution: An exchange, a response to
Thomas Nagel. New York Review of Books, 41(14), 54–55.
Grà¼nbaum, A. (1997). Is the concept of “psychic reality” a theoretical advance? Psychoanalysis
and Contemporary Thought, 20(2), 245–267.
Grà¼nbaum, A. (Forthcoming). Critique of Freud’s neurobiological and psychoanalytic dream theories.
In A. Grà¼nbaum (Ed.), Philosophy of science in action (Vol. 2). New York: Oxford University
Press.
Harman, G. (1965). Inference to the best explanation. Philosophical Review, 74, 88–95.
Holzman, P. (1994, July). Hilgard on psychoanalysis as science. Psychological Science, 5(4),
190–191.
Kernberg, O. F. (1993). Convergences and divergences in contemporary psychoanalytic technique.
International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 74, 659–673.
Kohut, H. (1984). How does analysis cure? Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Leibniz, G. (1981). New essays on human understanding (P. Remnant & J. Bennett, Trans.). Cambridge,
England: Cambridge University Press. (Original work published 1705)
Meehl, P. E. (1995). Commentary: Psychoanalysis as science. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic
Association, 43(4), 1015–1021.
Motley, M. (1980). Verification of “Freudian slips” and semantic prearticulatory editing via
laboratory-induced spoonerisms. In V. Fromkin (Ed.), Errors in linguistic performance: Slips
of the tongue, ear, pen, and hand (pp. 133–147). New York: Academic Press.
Nagel, T. (1994, May 12). Freud’s permanent revolution. New York Review of Books, 41(9), 34–38.
Reiser, M. (1989). The future of psychoanalysis in academic psychiatry: Plain talk. Psychoanalytic
Quarterly, 58, 158–209.
Ricoeur, P. (1970). Freud and philosophy. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Salmon, W. (1971). Statistical explanation and statistical relevance. Pittsburgh, PA: University of
Pittsburgh Press.
Salmon, W. (2001). Explanation and confirmation: A Bayesian critique of inference to the best
explanation. In G. Hon & S. S. Rackover (Eds.), Explanation: Theoretical approaches and applications
(pp. 61–91). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Press.
Schapiro, M. (1968). The apples of Cà©zanne. Art News Annual, 34, 34–53.
Schà¼ttauf, K., Bredenkamp, J., & Specht, E. K. (1997). Induzierte “Freudsche versprecher” und
zwangsneurotischer konflikt (Induced “Freudian slips of the tongue” and obsessive-compulsive
conflict). Sprache und Kognition, 16, 3–13.


Siamo la Società Leader del settore che ha supportato migliaia di tuoi colleghi in oltre 20 anni di esperienza (più di 600 solo quest'anno).

Solo per oggi Giovedì 5 Dicembre la tua tesi di laurea perfetta e completa al 100% da soli 390 €. Approfittane subito! Clicca sul banner qui sotto.
Hai bisogno di aiuto per la tesi? Ti supportiamo noi! Contattaci subito per una consulenza gratuita compilando e inviando il modulo qui sotto.
Richiesta di Supporto

Scrivi il tuo indirizzo email qui

Scrivi qui il tuo numero di cellulare per un contatto più celere (anche Whatsapp)

Scrivi qui il Corso di Laurea in cui ti stai laureando

Scrivi qui l'argomento esatto della tesi di laurea, della tesina o dell'elaborato che devi sviluppare

Seleziona qui i supporti didattici che ti interessano (tutti quelli che ti occorrono)

Scrivi qui il numero di pagine (anche orientativo) del lavoro

Scrivi qui la tempistica di consegna (anche orientativa) del lavoro

Dimensioni massime caricamento: 2.1MB.

Se vuoi inviarci un file (bozza di indice, lista bibliografica, elaborato da revisionare, appunti, etc.) caricalo qui. I formati consentiti sono pdf, ppt, word (doc, docx), rtf e txt

Quiz Tesi di Laurea

Quanto ne sai sulle tesi di laurea? Mettiti alla prova!

chevron_left
chevron_right

Leave a comment